The 100 as a question constellation

What kind of thing is “value”: a relation, state, preference, capability, welfare judgement, signal, attribution, resource or something else?

Which concepts must remain distinct: value, utility, price, welfare, wellbeing, meaning, preference, productivity and capital?

Is value relative to the experiencing person, observer, community or institution, or is some component claimed to be observer-independent?

What role does human time play: input, scarce resource, opportunity cost, exposure, state variable, budget constraint or accounting unit?

How should heterogeneous hours be compared across people, activities, skill, intensity, context, voluntariness and life stage?

Under what mathematical and normative conditions can time-based value be aggregated across episodes and people?

Should wellbeing W be represented as a scalar, multidimensional vector, latent variable, capability set, dynamic state-space or probability distribution?

What is the causal structure among physiology → affect/emotion → felt experience → cognition → habit/action → performance, and which arrows are bidirectional?

What timescales, memory effects, adaptation processes and delays govern changes in wellbeing?

Which effects vary by person, culture and context, and which are sufficiently stable to support generalisation?

How would W, Vcom, or other IoV constructs be operationalised with evidence of construct validity?

Do measurements remain invariant across groups, languages, cultures, contexts and time?

What biases enter through self-report, observers, sensors, platforms, incentives, missing data and selection?

Which latent quantities and causal parameters are actually identifiable from available observations, and how does uncertainty propagate?

What are the actual state variables, stocks, flows, auxiliary variables, feedback loops and exogenous drivers?

Through what mechanisms do individual states become community, institutional and economic outcomes?

Where is the system boundary, which variables are endogenous, and how sensitive are conclusions to alternative boundaries?

Where should we expect nonlinearities, thresholds, tipping behaviour, hysteresis, path dependence and adaptation?

How does IoV’s concept of value relate to utility, welfare, capabilities, revealed preference and subjective wellbeing?

How should non-market work, care, public goods, commons, externalities and relational value enter the model?

What precisely is the mechanism through which human/social value becomes economic or financial capital, and where might that conversion be a category error?

How do inequality, ownership, bargaining power and institutional rules affect who creates, measures and captures value?

Who gets to define metrics, weights, thresholds and rules, and through what process can those decisions be contested?

How does the system resist metric gaming, surveillance, coercion, discrimination and capture once measurements affect incentives?

Can a protocol remain robust in the presence of strategic behaviour, plural values, asymmetric information and changing incentives?

Which model family is justified for each IoV proposition: System Dynamics, ABM, causal model, network model, state-space model, optimisation/game model or hybrid, and why?

What data parameterise or calibrate the model, how well does it reproduce relevant behaviour, and when should it outperform competing models out-of-sample?

Does the model pass structural, dimensional, extreme-condition, sensitivity, uncertainty and participatory validation tests?

What observations, interventions or competing findings would falsify, or materially weaken, each major IoV proposition, including VC = W × Vcom?

Can an independent group inspect provenance, reproduce the analysis, fork the model, rerun it under different assumptions and publicly document disagreement?