Worked example · 01
A valued hour that also helps
Can the same event create an economic output and change the represented human state?
Midday · shared learning
A facilitated learning session is completed, the contribution has an explicit hypothetical rate, and the reviewed variation records a bounded improvement in reliable execution.
This is a synthetic variation on the paper’s redacted public worked day. It teaches a branch of the model; it is not a private record, observed personal event or empirical finding.
World 02 / 03
Performance in Institutions
Performance · valued · positive movement
Short answer
Yes—but the two outcomes are decided separately.
01 · Moment
Observed time slice
A bounded event with context and provenance.
02 · Economic question
Vcom 1000
Typed VC output: 700
03 · Human question
+0.021 WellbeingScore movement
Wbefore 700.000 → Wafter 700.021
Show the calculation
Four questions, in order.
- 01
Start with the prior state
The event reads Wbefore = 700.000.
- 02
Ask the economic question
Validated rate × duration produces Vcom = 1000 hypothetical credits.
- 03
Ask the human-state question
The reviewed input produces deltaW = 0.021, so Wafter = 700.021.
- 04
Keep the units honest
VCperformance = (Wbefore / 1000) × Vcom = 700 hypothetical credits.
What this means
The rate and duration constitute Vcom. A separate reviewed decision supplies the human-state movement. Neither result proves the other.
What it does not mean
It does not mean payment caused wellbeing improvement or that the person is worth the calculated output.
Technical layerAudit the calculationInspect statuses, intermediate values, provenance, uncertainty and raw scenario structure.
- Source settlement
- final
- Impact review
- applied
- Replay eligibility
- eligible
- Valuation
- valued
- Projection
- canonical
- Wbefore
- 700.000
- Component delta
- 0.07
- deltaW
- 0.021
- Wafter
- 700.021
- Vcom_event
- 1000
- VCperformance_event
- 700
Pinned implementation calculation
Complete component-transition trace
Every input and intermediate value is carried by the stable synthetic fixture or derived from its pinned issuer-policy snapshot.
- Components before
- { "Physiology": 700, "Emotion": 700, "Feeling": 700, "Thought": 700, "Habit": 700, "Performance": 700 }
- calculated_Wbefore
- 700
- Affected component
- Performance
- component_before
- 700
- Band
- (600,700]
- band_rate
- 0.03
- adjustment_factor
- 0.005
- Direction
- positive
- Intensity
- medium
- intensity_multiplier
- 2/3
- maximum_move
- 0.105
- calculated_component_delta
- 0.07
- component_after
- 700.07
- component_weight
- 0.3
- calculated_deltaW
- 0.021
- calculated_Wafter
- 700.021
- Typed Vcom_event
- 1000
- Typed VCperformance_event
- 700
maximum_move = 700 × 0.03 × 0.005 = 0.105
component_delta = 0.105 × 2/3 × 1 = 0.07
component_after = 700 + (0.07) = 700.07
deltaW = 0.07 × 0.3 = 0.021
Wafter = 700 + (0.021) = 700.021
Vcom_event = validated rate × validated duration = 1000
VCperformance_event = (700 / 1000) × 1000 = 700
Required case note
Impact justification
- Assumed synthetic evidence
- A synthetic source decision validates two hours at 500 hypothetical credits per hour; a separate synthetic HouseOfBros review input records improved completion reliability across the occurrence.
- Reviewed decision input
- positive · medium
- Calculation demonstrated
- The calculator applies the pinned HouseOfBros Founder Policy v0.1 transition matrix to the declared component state. It does not infer direction or intensity from the evidence narrative.
- Decision rationale
- Applied because the reviewed input asserts a bounded improvement rather than routine repetition.
- Alternative interpretations
- Routine delivery could support no_transition.
- Strain could support negative impact.
- Uncertainty
- This synthetic case has not been calibrated against observed longitudinal evidence or independent reviewer agreement.
- Evidence-to-intensity rubric
- unvalidated. Direction and intensity are reviewed inputs; the calculator does not infer them from prose.
- Validation research required
- Prospective rate-blinded review, repeated within-person observations and inter-rater agreement.