The Internet of ValueInsightsTime banking comparison

Chapter 5 of 11 · Kerala’s time bank

A pilot is not a statewide rollout

The documentary trail distinguishes a reported local trial from a proposed wider programme. These milestones do not establish a completed statewide rollout.

  1. 20 June 2023

    Software invitation

    K-DISC EOI

    Official document [K1]
  2. 30 October 2025

    Local pilot reported

    Elikulam, Kottayam

    Launch reporting [K2]
  3. 22 August 2026

    Feasibility invitation

    Statewide study EOI

    Official notice [K4]
  4. 9 November 2026

    Expansion proposed

    Guidelines still pending

    Dated reporting [K6]
These are different documentary milestones, not a verified procurement-to-rollout chain. Sources and retrieval limits remain in the notes.
A smaller local record and a larger proposed programme document remain separated by a visible gap.
Documents, a reported pilot and a statewide proposal are different evidence stages. [K1][K2][K4][K6]

Kerala I&PRD’s Malayalam notice of 22 August 2026, PNX 3377/2026, announces a Social Justice Department invitation to academic and research institutions to study the feasibility of implementing a statewide time-bank scheme. It describes digitally recording young people’s service to senior citizens and issuing time credits. The submission deadline was 10 September 2026. This is my English paraphrase of the notice. [K4]

The New Indian Express’s 9 November 2026 account, attributed to the director of the department of senior citizens, describes proposed future redemption and family transfer. Student grace marks and travel or fuel coupons were options being explored. It says guidelines were not yet finalised and initial implementation would be piloted in selected districts or local bodies. Those possible benefits are not entitlements established by this article. [K6]

What remains unverified in the official trail?

The indexed listing identifies SJD/3330/2026-G5 as a feasibility-study EOI; the signed attachment was not retrieved. A final statewide implementation order was not located in the reviewed sources. Nor was a formal administrative handover between the earlier pilot and later proposal established. These are limits of this research, not proof that the documents or arrangements do not exist. [K5]