Back to reading journal

The Internet of Value

Tim doesn’t know who’ll build it next. I’m raising my hand.

By 2026-11-12T13:30:59+05:30

A personal response to Tim Berners-Lee’s invitation to build trustworthy web tools, connecting The Internet of Value, ~WellbeingIdentity and registered expressions.

Reading day: Monday, 9 November 2026. Third entry from This Is for Everyone: The Unfinished Story of the World Wide Web by Tim Berners-Lee.

The passage

will carry the same level of privilege and confidentiality that you’d expect from communications with a lawyer or a doctor.
When I was asked to transmit a live message to hundreds of millions of viewers at the Opening Ceremony of the 2012 London Olympics, I wrote: ‘This Is For Everyone’. Now, in the age of AI, I believe that to be true more than ever. We can restore the web as a tool for collaboration, creativity and compassion across cultural borders. We can fix the internet, and the next person to build web tools can push the boundaries of self-expression and deserve our trust. I don’t know who that individual is, and I can’t predict where they’ll come from. What I do know is that that passion is out there, and that if we dedicate our minds to it, we can take the web back. It’s not too late.

Tim Berners-Lee, This Is for Everyone: The Unfinished Story of the World Wide Web.

All visible passage text is transcribed above. The screenshot starts with the end of a preceding sentence; no missing beginning has been invented. Display line breaks and line-wrap hyphenation are joined. The original is preserved below.

Full supplied book screenshot: Tim Berners-Lee’s invitation to fix the internet, build web tools for self-expression and deserve trust, highlighted in green and gold.
The supplied passage and highlights, unchanged.

I read this as an invitation

When he said, “We can fix the internet,” I obviously thought about The Internet of Value. Then I read about the next person to build web tools, and my response was: I believe that person could be me.

I want to take the highlighted part apart, phrase by phrase, and put what we are building beside it. Here is the invitation I hear, and here is my response. The connections below are mine; Berners-Lee’s passage is not an endorsement of me or of The Internet of Value.

The passage, connected to the work

His words → my response

An invitation. Six places to begin.

01 · THE POSSIBILITY“We can fix the internet”The Internet of Value: putting human time, wellbeing and contribution into the picture.Explore the human layer ↗02 · THE PERSON“the next person to build web tools”I believe I could be that person. Meet Moses Sam Paul Johnraj through my public ~WellbeingIdentity.Meet the person behind the work ↗03 · THE EXPRESSION“push the boundaries of self-expression”Word Wallet Web: registered expressions with definitions, handlers, attribution and governance.Explore Word Wallet Web ↗04 · THE EVIDENCE“deserve our trust”Trust should be earned. Inspect my public wellbeing update, its calculation date and the context behind it.Look at the public evidence ↗05 · THE IDENTITY“I don’t know who that individual is”Here is who I am, what I am building and the context I choose to share.Open my ~WellbeingIdentity ↗06 · THE ORIGIN“I can’t predict where they’ll come from”Born in Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India. Mostly based in Bangalore. In Goa as I record this reflection.Read where I come from ↗

“What I do know is that that passion is out there, and that if we dedicate our minds to it, we can take the web back.” — Tim Berners-Lee

The human layer

The way I picture it is this: HTTP made the exchange of content possible across the web. Bitcoin and UPI are different approaches to moving money or enabling value exchange. Protocols such as Beckn enable open-network transactions around goods and services. Then I ask: where does the person appear in this picture? Where are their time, their wellbeing and their contribution?

That is what I mean by a fourth layer: a human layer. This is my conceptual analogy for explaining the work, rather than a claim that these technologies form one formal network stack. The Internet of Value is the protocol system through which we are trying to make human time and contribution intelligible, with wellbeing and community context.

Its four protocols have different responsibilities. ~ValueCaptureProtocol records time, activity, evidence and attribution. ~WellbecomingProtocol supplies context across ~~Physiology, ~~Emotion, ~~Feeling, ~~Thought, ~~Habit and ~~Performance. Qualifying ~~Performance can enter ~SAOcommons for institutional review, attestation and valuation. ~WellbeingIdentity carries the living state shaped through those flows, with consent and disclosure choices.

A person with eight ~WellbeingIdentity rings records a time slice that passes through ~ValueCaptureProtocol and ~WellbecomingProtocol. ~~Performance may enter ~SAOcommons review; private and validated results return separately to identity.
The existing human-protocol diagram. Open it to explore the protocol stack.

The person does not become an interchangeable transaction. The point is to carry more meaningful context about what they do, how they are doing and what others have actually recognised. The protocol lineage uses ~~~~ProtocolLinkId to connect records; it does not erase differences between a self-report, a calculation and an attestation.

More room for expression

Today, expressing something online often means building a website or an app, or working inside a platform’s chosen format. Twitter, Instagram and similar platforms give us tools, but they also set the boundaries of the expression.

With Word Wallet Web, I’m interested in another possibility: an expression that can be registered, given meaning, connected to a declared capability and carried into a wider community of use. The registered-expression catalogue and ~Cortisol Checker~ are concrete places to explore that direction.

I want creators and communities to be able to earn from the value they help create through those expressions. That is an economic ambition for the system. The current Word Wallet beta records attribution; it does not activate payouts, financial rights, ownership or guaranteed earnings. The Word Wallet Web explanation keeps those present capabilities and future possibilities distinct.

Trust should be earned

I’m grateful that he uses the words “deserve our trust.” For me, that means making something available for people to examine. Here is my identity. Here is the public wellbeing evidence I choose to share. Here is how the score is described and when it was calculated.

My ~~~WellbeingScore is not a certificate of moral worth. What matters to this argument is the willingness to make a claim inspectable, to show its method and limitations, and to let people decide what confidence they place in it. The latest available public update appears at the end of this entry, with a link back to my ~WellbeingIdentity.

Where I come from

I was born in Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India. I’m mostly based out of Bangalore, and I’m in Goa as I record these thoughts.

So when I read “I don’t know who that individual is,” I want to put my ~WellbeingIdentity there. And when I read “I can’t predict where they’ll come from,” I have an answer about where this particular person comes from.

I’m saying this because I believe I can contribute to that future. The passage gives me an invitation to respond with the work itself.

As for the passion being out there, and dedicating our minds to taking the web back: I don’t have anything to add. That part already says what I feel.

Sources and further reading

References

Back to article start

The public evidence, as it stands

This is the latest owner-approved public update returned when this page is read, with its own calculation date; it updates independently of the journal’s reading date. If it is unavailable or withheld, no score is shown. A score is one declared, method-dependent signal, not proof of honesty or a guarantee of trustworthiness.

Explore my ~WellbeingIdentity and score context ↗

~

End of signal.