Worked example · 02

A self-review cannot become independent review

Can one person’s self-review satisfy a role that requires independent settlement?

Midday · provisional self-review

The observer supplies a self-review and an impact input, but the synthetic source requires an eligible independent reviewer who has not yet settled it.

This is a synthetic variation on the paper’s redacted public worked day. It teaches a branch of the model; it is not a private record, observed personal event or empirical finding.

World 03 / 03

Record Integrity Lab

Performance · provisional preview

See the related cases

Short answer

No. The preview may be visible, but the canonical route remains blocked.

01 · Moment

Observed time slice

A bounded event with context and provenance.

02 · Economic question

Economic value unavailable

No typed VC output is constituted here.

03 · Human question

+0.021 WellbeingScore movement

Wbefore 700.000 → Wafter 700.021

One event can produce two independently governed answers. Orange marks an active result; graphite preserves an inactive or unavailable possibility without turning it into zero.

Show the calculation

Four questions, in order.

  1. 01

    Start with the prior state

    The event reads Wbefore = 700.000.

  2. 02

    Ask the economic question

    No typed Vcom is constituted for this case.

  3. 03

    Ask the human-state question

    The reviewed input produces deltaW = 0.021, so Wafter = 700.021.

  4. 04

    Keep the units honest

    No economic VC output is produced. A wellbeing movement is not converted into money or credits.

What this means

Role labels preserve who decided what. The fixture can calculate a preview without pretending the source is final.

What it does not mean

Provisional does not mean false; it means the required authority condition is incomplete.

Technical layerAudit the calculationInspect statuses, intermediate values, provenance, uncertainty and raw scenario structure.
Source settlement
provisional
Impact review
applied
Replay eligibility
blocked source provisional
Valuation
inputs ready source provisional
Projection
provisional preview only
Wbefore
700.000
Component delta
0.07
deltaW
0.021
Wafter
700.021
Vcom_event
null
VCperformance_event
null

Provisional preview calculation

Complete component-transition trace

Every input and intermediate value is carried by the stable synthetic fixture or derived from its pinned issuer-policy snapshot.

Components before
{ "Physiology": 700, "Emotion": 700, "Feeling": 700, "Thought": 700, "Habit": 700, "Performance": 700 }
calculated_Wbefore
700
Affected component
Performance
component_before
700
Band
(600,700]
band_rate
0.03
adjustment_factor
0.005
Direction
positive
Intensity
medium
intensity_multiplier
2/3
maximum_move
0.105
calculated_component_delta
0.07
component_after
700.07
component_weight
0.3
calculated_deltaW
0.021
calculated_Wafter
700.021
Typed Vcom_event
null
Typed VCperformance_event
null

maximum_move = 700 × 0.03 × 0.005 = 0.105

component_delta = 0.105 × 2/3 × 1 = 0.07

component_after = 700 + (0.07) = 700.07

deltaW = 0.07 × 0.3 = 0.021

Wafter = 700 + (0.021) = 700.021

Required case note

Impact justification

Assumed synthetic evidence
A synthetic founder self-review exists with an impact input, but the required independent GFE source review is absent.
Reviewed decision input
positive · medium (impact input only)
Calculation demonstrated
The calculator applies the pinned HouseOfBros Founder Policy v0.1 transition matrix to the declared component state. It does not infer direction or intensity from the evidence narrative.
Decision rationale
Source settlement remains provisional, so replay and canonical projection are blocked even though HouseOfBros impact review is separately represented.
Alternative interpretations
  • An independent reviewer may validate, correct, or reject the source claim.
Uncertainty
This synthetic case has not been calibrated against observed longitudinal evidence or independent reviewer agreement.
Evidence-to-intensity rubric
unvalidated. Direction and intensity are reviewed inputs; the calculator does not infer them from prose.
Validation research required
Independent-review agreement, delegation safeguards and appeals testing.