Worked example · 02
We do not know yet
What should the system say before the required decision is complete?
Midday · evidence awaiting review
The learning session has source evidence and an explicit hypothetical rate, but its human-impact evidence has not yet been reviewed.
This is a synthetic variation on the paper’s redacted public worked day. It teaches a branch of the model; it is not a private record, observed personal event or empirical finding.
World 03 / 03
Record Integrity Lab
Performance · decision pending
Short answer
Pending—not zero, rejected or quietly assumed.
01 · Moment
Observed time slice
A bounded event with context and provenance.
02 · Economic question
Economic value unavailable
No typed VC output is constituted here.
03 · Human question
Human-state decision incomplete
No canonical Wafter is available.
Show the calculation
Four questions, in order.
- 01
Start with the prior state
The event reads Wbefore = 700.000.
- 02
Ask the economic question
No typed Vcom is constituted for this case.
- 03
Ask the human-state question
The required decision is incomplete, so no canonical movement is produced.
- 04
Keep the units honest
No economic VC output is produced. A wellbeing movement is not converted into money or credits.
What this means
The unfinished impact decision blocks a canonical transition and canonical valuation output for this fixture.
What it does not mean
Pending is not a prediction about what the eventual decision will be.
Technical layerAudit the calculationInspect statuses, intermediate values, provenance, uncertainty and raw scenario structure.
- Source settlement
- final
- Impact review
- pending
- Replay eligibility
- blocked impact pending
- Valuation
- inputs ready pending canonical settlement
- Projection
- pending
- Wbefore
- 700.000
- Component delta
- null
- deltaW
- null
- Wafter
- —
- Vcom_event
- null
- VCperformance_event
- null
Required case note
Impact justification
- Assumed synthetic evidence
- A synthetic source decision and explicit rate are present, but the impact evidence packet has not been reviewed.
- Reviewed decision input
- pending
- Calculation demonstrated
- The calculator applies the pinned HouseOfBros Founder Policy v0.1 transition matrix to the declared component state. It does not infer direction or intensity from the evidence narrative.
- Decision rationale
- Pending prevents a canonical transition and canonical valuation output until the separate impact decision completes.
- Alternative interpretations
- Review could conclude positive, negative, or no_transition.
- Uncertainty
- This synthetic case has not been calibrated against observed longitudinal evidence or independent reviewer agreement.
- Evidence-to-intensity rubric
- unvalidated. Direction and intensity are reviewed inputs; the calculator does not infer them from prose.
- Validation research required
- Decision-time reliability and evidence-sufficiency studies.