Sources and methods

The references, methods and illustration notes for the complete account are collected here. The narrative remains one person's observational case.

How was this account assembled?

Which sources and checks support the numerical account?

The numerical supplement was reconciled on 3 November 2026 from the retained 172-record activity export and a separate account-scoped score-history export. The latter contains one promoted live founder branch, a passed replay verification, one preceding boundary state, 51 state revisions and 116 value events for the window. The analysis checks owner identity, policy, component-weighted totals, transition arithmetic and day/period reconciliation. Private identifiers and unredacted narratives are excluded from the reading payload. Exact source hashes remain in the research receipts.

How is the public Identity view kept separate?

The interactive Identity is a separately dated view of the owner-approved public projection. Its current score is not substituted for the end-of-residency score. Published skills, values and Story facets do not establish dated changes in those nodes. The published account uses a dated public capture; no Identity disclosure or production activity record was changed as part of preparing it.

The byline’s dated score and its published daily movement come from the owner-approved public Founder score projection²⁵. They are separate from the frozen residency analysis.

Whose account and interpretations are these?

This is a single-person exploratory account, written from my Value Log records and later reflections. The author is also the system's creator. All 172 current activity descriptions in the scoped export were reviewed. The account mixes dated records, later recollection and interpretation; where a later detail materially expands the source, that distinction is retained in the editorial traceability notes. Other participants are unnamed; Manvendra Singh is named with the author's permission. Their experiences and intentions are not established by my account.

How were dates, intervals and missing time handled?

The export window is 22 October–1 November 2026 in Asia/Kolkata. Time totals use the union of recorded intervals clipped to the relevant boundaries; no overlaps were found. Counts describe records, not independent experiences or participants. Some activities are bundled, and some continuous sleep episodes are split at midnight. Canonical creation time is distinguished from original capture time. The adjacent dates are contextual observations, not controls.

Canonical creation timing does not establish when the original observation was first captured or how accurate the recollection is.

What was not established by this analysis?

The numerical work covers activity records, classifications, time coverage, the promoted six-component/score history and separately typed founder value events. The two earlier reported deltas did not reproduce for the stated windows and are superseded by the explicitly bounded results above. Legacy Pilot W/credit tables were exported for provenance but are not combined with this founder ledger. No micro-phenomenological interview was conducted for this account. The study proposals do not constitute ethics approval, participant recruitment or a claim of treatment efficacy.

How was AI used in this account?

AI assisted analysis and drafting under human authorship. This account was reviewed and approved by the author. Independent scientific peer review is not claimed.

Source of Truth (Specs)

Where does protocol authority sit?

Protocol definitions are grounded in the canonical registry²⁶, Value Capture specification⁹, Wellbecoming specification¹⁰, Wellbeing Identity specification⁷ and SAOcommons valuation interface¹⁵. These sources define the architecture; they do not establish scientific validation of this case's measurements.

Which canonical terms identify these sources?

Canonical terms: ~ValueCaptureProtocol, ~WellbecomingProtocol, ~SAOcommons, ~WellbeingIdentity, WellbeingScore, ProtocolLinkId.

By Moses Sam Paul Johnraj. This account uses AI-assisted writing and illustration and was reviewed by the author. The dates, evidence boundaries and limitations stated in the account apply throughout.